<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indians To Get Enfield Bullet Classic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motorbeam.com/bikes/royal-enfield-bullet/indians-to-get-enfield-bullet-classic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motorbeam.com/bikes/royal-enfield-bikes/indians-to-get-enfield-bullet-classic/</link>
	<description>News, Reviews of Indian Cars, Bikes - Maruti, Hyundai, Tata, Fiat, Toyota, Bajaj, Hero Honda, TVS, Yamaha</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sumit</title>
		<link>http://www.motorbeam.com/bikes/royal-enfield-bikes/indians-to-get-enfield-bullet-classic/comment-page-1/#comment-27521</link>
		<dc:creator>sumit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorbeam.com/?p=10629#comment-27521</guid>
		<description>Why? Cant they spare us some more bad time with their lousy and over expensive bikes? I had enough of bullet when there was viable choice available. No more .... the good times are here with Pulsar 220 and Bullet can go to HELL!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why? Cant they spare us some more bad time with their lousy and over expensive bikes? I had enough of bullet when there was viable choice available. No more &#8230;. the good times are here with Pulsar 220 and Bullet can go to HELL!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/307 objects using memcached

Served from: www.motorbeam.com @ 2012-02-14 07:53:28 -->
